“The After Birth Abortion” – The Slippery Slope of the Pro-Aborts

A group of “experts” have created quite a stir by publishing an article in which they conclude that there is no difference between aborting a fetus and killing a newborn for any reason.  The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, can be read here.

Is it not ironic that these immoral academics, who champion the killing of a whole group of individuals based upon their age and/or disability, protest the death threats they themselves have received since the publication of  their article? 

I will say that they inadvertantly got one thing right:  There is no difference between killing a fetus and killing a newborn.   Bravo, you evil people.

 

A group of ethicists has argued that killing young babies is no different from abortion Photo: Alamy

From the Telegraph.co.uk

By Stephen Adams

Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are   “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a   group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.

The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn   babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The   academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed   if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.

The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro   Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article’s authors had received death   threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and   threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values  of a liberal society”.

read more at the Telegraph.co.uk

This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.